Rareş Dădârlat's Quest
 
Type: Deck Idea
Format (legal 👍) modModern
Approx. Value:
$67.43

1 Likes 9 Comments
Avg. CMC 1.6
Card Color Breakdown
Card Type Breakdown

Remove ads
Main Deck - 60 cards, 14 distinct
Columns
Name  Edition $ Type Cost
Rarity Color
Creature (31)
4 Accorder Paladin
$0.16 Creature - Human Knight
4 Glint Hawk
$0.81 Creature - Bird
4 Kor Skyfisher
$0.77 Creature - Kor Soldier
4 Memnite
$3.43 Artifact Creature - Construct
4 Ornithopter
$0.27 Artifact Creature - Thopter
4 Signal Pest
$0.52 Artifact Creature - Pest
3 Squadron Hawk
$0.19 Creature - Bird
4 Steppe Lynx
$0.15 Creature - Cat
Artifact (2)
2 Argentum Armor
$1.19 Artifact - Equipment
Enchantment (4)
4 Quest for the Holy Relic
$0.20 Enchantment
Land (23)
4 Contested War Zone
$0.20 Land
4 Evolving Wilds
$0.07 Land
11 Plains
$0.06 Basic Land - Plains
4 Terramorphic Expanse
$0.06 Land
Sideboard - 15 cards, 6 distinct
Name  Edition $ Type Cost
Rarity Color
Creature (8)
4 Kor Firewalker
$0.10 Creature - Kor Soldier
3 Salvage Scout
$0.10 Creature - Human Scout
1 Squadron Hawk
$0.19 Creature - Bird
Instant (3)
3 Celestial Purge
$0.30 Instant
Artifact (4)
3 Jinxed Idol
$0.52 Artifact
1 Sword of Feast and Famine
$33.91 Artifact - Equipment

Comments
  • Fejér István | Edited 11-Oct-2011 08:15
    Evolving Wilds nu e cam lent pentru deckul asta?
    • Rareş Dădârlat | 11-Oct-2011 08:34
      totally slow. Deckul funcționa cu fetch-lands d-alea scumpe, dar asta era varianta budget și na...
      • Fejér István | 11-Oct-2011 08:35
        Oh, I see :) And still above 60$
        • Rareş Dădârlat | 11-Oct-2011 08:57
          Sword of Feast and Famine din side face mai mult de jumate din deck. aia era super opțional :D
  • btchard | 11-Oct-2011 07:48
    i can totaly see cum ar functiona decku . dar mi se pare prea vulnerabil dupa prima tura dupa ce adaugi din sidedeck . but still . i like the idea :D tot ceva de genu vroiam si eu sa fac doar ca vroiam sa fac cu humans si treasure mage . sounded better .
    • Rareş Dădârlat | 11-Oct-2011 08:14
      Vezi că deckul acesta e deja ieșit din standard. Dar da, funcționa chiar bine ca și deck aggro.
  • Rausz Roland | 02-Mar-2011 09:50
    de ce nu 4x Squadron Hawk ?
    • Rareş Dădârlat | 02-Mar-2011 14:31
      Simplu: nu e loc de al 4-lea. E pus în side pentru match-up vs. control => card advantage.
      • Rausz Roland | 03-Mar-2011 11:15
        am inteles ! :D
    • No comments yet.